Cureus | MRI of Acute Low Back Pain: About an Uncommon Pitfall

2023-01-03 13:19:01 By : Ms. Ruby Liu

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."

Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming. Aluminium Melting Furnaces

Cureus | MRI of Acute Low Back Pain: About an Uncommon Pitfall

excluded disc fragment, inflammatory disc herniation, lumbago, epidural mass, posteriorly migrated disc extrusion

Meriem Ben Ghanem, Niloufar Sadeghi, Stephanie Elens

Cite this article as: Ben Ghanem M, Sadeghi N, Elens S (March 06, 2022) MRI of Acute Low Back Pain: About an Uncommon Pitfall. Cureus 14(3): e22905. doi:10.7759/cureus.22905

Posteriorly migrated disc extrusion may mimic tumoral masses on MRI with contrast; still, this diagnosis must be evoked in patients presenting acute low back pain with a posterior epidural mass.

We describe a case of epidural posterior migration of an inflammatory lumbar disc herniation in a young patient with acute lumbosciatica. MRI showed an intracanalar mass with intense global enhancement, which is an uncommon feature of this rare condition.

Migration of an excluded or non-excluded disc herniation usually occurs into the anterior epidural space. Posterior migration of excluded disc fragments is an extremely rare entity and is a radiological challenging diagnosis. The differential diagnosis includes neoplastic masses that may lead to unnecessary surgical excision in case of misdiagnosis [1-4].

We report a case of dorsally sequestrated lumbar disc herniation that was initially diagnosed as a meningioma on MRI. We then analyze the clinical and imaging features in light of literature data.

A 28-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with chronic low back pain. He reported acute sciatica irradiating to the left lower limb for three days, exacerbated by movement, not resolving with usual analgesic treatments. He had no sensory-motor deficits and the physical examination was normal except for a left Lasègue sign. An MRI was prescribed followed by an appointment for a neurosurgical consultation within two weeks. The MRI revealed a minor discopathy and an intracanalar expansive mass, measuring 14 mm of major axis, located in the left posterolateral epidural space. It was displacing the dural sac and the left S1- S2 roots to the right. Because of this contact with the left lamina of S1 and the intense enhancement after contrast injection, the diagnosis made was meningioma (Figures 1A-1F). 

(A) Sagittal T1, (B) T2, (C) T2 STIR, (D): axial T2: intracanalar expansive mass of 14 mm, located in the left posterolateral epidural space at the S1 level, hypointense on T1-WI, heterogeneous on T2-WI and hyperintense on T2 STIR-WI. (E, F) Axial and sagittal T1 with gadolinium: homogeneous and intense enhancement of the whole lesion.

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The patient lost to follow-up and no additional support was carried out until he was referred by his doctor for a recurrence of low back pain after a year. The control MRI no longer shows the previously described intracanal mass with intense enhancement in L5-S1 (Figures 2A-2F). We deduce that the disappeared mass was actually an inflammatory discal extrusion that has resolved. We also note a persistent discopathy on L4-L5 and L5-S1. 

(A) Sagittal T1, (B) T2, (C) T2 STIR; (D) axial T2; (E, F): axial and sagittal T1 post-contrast: posterior descending discal protrusion, in conflict with the left S1 root. There is no intracanalar mass.

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Anatomically, migration of an excluded disc fragment usually occurs in the anterior epidural space and is sub-ligamentary. The posterior longitudinal ligament includes a medial septum which subdivides the anterior epidural space into a right and left space, thus providing an anatomical barrier to right-left disc migration. In addition, the lateral membranes that close this anterior epidural space and the spinal nerves represent two further barriers to anteroposterior migration [1,2]. Therefore, excluded disc herniation with posterior migration is an uncommon event with a frequency of less than 1% [3]. The most frequent locations are L3-L4 and L4-L5 [1]. Classically reported clinical presentations are radiculalgia and cauda equina syndrome [1,3]. The differential diagnosis includes tumors, mainly schwannoma and meningioma, synovial cyst, epidural abscess, and hematoma [1-5]. MRI is the recommended examination before a potential decompression surgery with laminectomy and discectomy [1,3]. On MR scans, the sequestrated disc usually shows a low signal intensity on T1-WI and homogeneous or heterogeneous hyper-intensity on T2-WI. It may also be hypo-intense due to disc degeneration and water loss on T2-WI. After injection of gadolinium, the central part of the disc fragment does not take the contrast while the periphery is enhanced. This peripheral enhancement reflects the inflammatory response and is a key element in the positive diagnosis of herniation as opposed to tumors, where contrast enhancement is generally uniform [1-4]. However, global enhancement of the fragment, although infrequent, has been reported in 14% of cases. In the literature, imaging did not suggest a posteriorly migrated herniated disc in 68% of cases and the diagnosis could only be made pre-operatively [1].

Excluded disc fragment might be considered in cases with a lumbar posterior epidural mass in a patient presenting with acute lumbago. MRI with gadolinium is the best diagnostic tool, with a classically peripheral enhancement of the disc fragment. However, in the case of severe inflammatory disc herniation, a complete enhancement of the disc fragment would constitute a pitfall and this diagnosis should not be excluded.

Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, BEL

Radiodiagnosis, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, BEL

Radiology, Erasmus Hospital, Brussels, BEL

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Ben Ghanem M, Sadeghi N, Elens S (March 06, 2022) MRI of Acute Low Back Pain: About an Uncommon Pitfall. Cureus 14(3): e22905. doi:10.7759/cureus.22905

Peer review began: January 13, 2022 Peer review concluded: March 04, 2022 Published: March 06, 2022

© Copyright 2022 Ben Ghanem et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

(A) Sagittal T1, (B) T2, (C) T2 STIR, (D): axial T2: intracanalar expansive mass of 14 mm, located in the left posterolateral epidural space at the S1 level, hypointense on T1-WI, heterogeneous on T2-WI and hyperintense on T2 STIR-WI. (E, F) Axial and sagittal T1 with gadolinium: homogeneous and intense enhancement of the whole lesion.

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(A) Sagittal T1, (B) T2, (C) T2 STIR; (D) axial T2; (E, F): axial and sagittal T1 post-contrast: posterior descending discal protrusion, in conflict with the left S1 root. There is no intracanalar mass.

MRI - Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.

This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.

Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.

Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)

Already have an account? Sign in.

Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.

Cureus | MRI of Acute Low Back Pain: About an Uncommon Pitfall

Aluminium Extrusion Machinery By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.